Good Soul of Szechuan

Having enjoyed Strawdog’s production of “Uncle Vanya” recently, we decided to watch their latest production, Bertolt Brecht’s “The Good Soul of Szechuan.”

WSJ Review by Terry Teachout:

If you doubt that it’s possible to write a political play that is both passionate and poetic, I offer in evidence Bertolt Brecht’s “The Good Soul of Szechuan,” a parable of capitalism and its discontents that the Strawdog Theatre Company is performing with an exciting blend of fire, fantasy and irreverence.

The last of these qualities is especially important when it comes to the plays of Brecht, which are too often directed so didactically that they become stiff. Not this time: Shade Murray’s deceptively casual staging has the helter-skelter feel of a frat party whose guests have decided on the spur of the moment to put on a show. As you enter the black-box theater, a gaggle of musicians in the corner of the room are singing songs by Neil Young and Leonard Cohen. Then, almost without warning, the play gets under way, and before you know it you’re swept up in the tale of a Chinese village whose most spiritually minded citizen is a whore with a heart of 10-karat gold (Michaela Petro, who is terrific). Shen Te has come under the scrutiny of a trio of credulous gods who decide to reward her for her goodness, thereby triggering the law of unintended consequences and bringing about a sequence of dire and farcical events that are portrayed with great gusto by Mr. Murray’s fine cast.

The moral of “The Good Soul of Szechuan” is that it is impossible to do good in a radically corrupt society, and if you share Brecht’s Marxist politics, this leads to the ineluctable conclusion that capitalism must give way to communism. Fortunately, Brecht was a better poet than a prophet, and the symbolism of “The Good Soul of Szechuan” is sufficiently supple to allow viewers who take a different view of the devastating effects of communism on the human soul to interpret the play not as a Marxist tract but as a tragedy of man’s flawed nature. Either way, Strawdog’s production is a vibrantly expressive piece of theater that keeps you watching, then sends you home thinking—a solid working definition of what a good play should do.

The racy, colloquial translation is by David Harrower (“Blackbird”). Nic Dimond, Strawdog’s artistic director, designed the ramshackle set, which is atmospheric in just the right way. As the author of “The Threepenny Opera,” Brecht would surely have approved of it, and I also think he would have liked the musical settings by Mike Przygoda and Mikhail Fiksel of his lyrics, which are played with raggle-taggle abandon by a band whose randomly dressed members, much like the actors, give the charming impression of having poked their heads into the theater out of curiosity.

It was an awesome performance, not least because of Michaela Petro, who had an incredible range of emotions and a raw but powerful singing voice. I did not, however, get Brecht’s commentary on the pitfalls of capitalism; if anything, the moral of the story seemed to me that socialism could not succeed! And I also didn’t so much share the interpretation of the “tragedy of man’s flawed nature,” but rather saw it as a caution to those wanting to put blind faith in the power of the gods. Nevertheless, it was another enjoyable evening at the small and intimate theatre.


One thought on “Good Soul of Szechuan


    Capitalism was founded upon basic principles: production, supply and demand, and capital accumulation. It is a social theory whereby prices are determined by profit and loss, as well as market interest and fluctuations.

    Although I understand the need for a free market enterprise, such a theory should not imply that we are willing to disregard our environment, or sacrifice the needs and comforts of our humanity in an attempt to realize higher profits (a.k.a., BP, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, etc).

    Capitalism may be wonderful, but like anything else, it is still a flawed system. It’s a work in progress. It needs to be tweaked here and there in order to perfect its balance and to soothe the inordinate swings that occur day-to-day in our financial markets. If left unchecked, however, such a system will prove to be our economic downfall.

    How so?

    Well, for one thing, there is only so much profit a business can make from a product before it is left to cut costs in both quality and workmanship. In order to continually sustain a profit, businesses have to create those same products with lower quality ingredients and cheaper labor: which means that they must pull up stakes and move to other countries like China, Taiwan, or Mexico in order to survive. What does this eventually mean for people like you and me? It means that the very financial theory that promoted our country to super power status has turned on us. It means that the American workforce is now expected to work harder, longer, cheaper, and faster if we are to compete with the global economy now breathing down our necks.

    Where do we go from here?

    George Orwell had it right, to some extent, when he wrote his book1984. Many years from now, money will become worthless and the global populace will be employed and subject to hundreds (if not thousands) of individualized corporations that managed to survive attrition through merger aquisitions. It will be a feudalistic society: every corporation out for blood and vying for global dominance and absolute power. Our children and grandchildren will be there too: housed, clothed and fed by these various corporate entities; all the while being sent out on occasion, like brainless automatons, to errands of war, in an effort to absorb the weakest corporations into the fold. After all the dust settles, and everything is said and done, the remaining corporations will finally merge into a one-world government.

    Science fiction, you say?

    (…I’m left wondering.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s